Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:01

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Can adults grow new brain cells? - Live Science
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Pokémon Go Serene Retreat Collection Challenges and rewards - Eurogamer
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do narcissists keep calling on the phone after years of separation?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Nvidia tops Microsoft, regains most valuable company title for first time since January - CNBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.